Tennessee Wine & Spirits

Retailers Association v. Thomas

Case Overview

CITATION

ARGUED ON

DECIDED ON

DECIDED BY

588 U.S. 504

Jan. 16, 2019

Jun. 26, 2019

Legal Issues

Does a Tennessee law imposing a two year residency requirement for retail licenses violate the Commerce Clause? Is the Tennessee law a valid exercise of the 21st Amendment’s grant of authority to States to regulate the sale of alcohol?

Holding

Yes, the residency requirement violates the Commerce Clause because it blatantly favored the State’s residents, and the requirement is not protected by the 21st Amendment because it has an insufficient connection to public health and safety.

Doug and Mary Ketchum with their attorney, Michael Bindas, outside the Supreme Court | Credit: The Institute for Justice

Background

Tennessee law imposed a series of strict durational-residency requirements on all people and businesses applying to obtain a license to operate a liquor store in the State. To obtain an initial retail license, an individual was required to show that they had “been a bona fide resident” of the State for the previous two years.

Total Wine & More, seeking to open a location in Knoxville, Tennessee, and Doug and Mary Ketchum, the new owners of Kimbrough Wines & Spirits in Memphis, Tennessee applied to obtain initial retail licenses. A legal opinion from Tennessee Attorney General Herbert Slatery III advised against enforcement of the residency requirement, so the Tennessee Alcoholic Beverages Commission intended to approve the license applications.

The Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association, an organization representing nearly 500 liquor stores in the State, filed an action in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee to order enforcement of the residency requirement. Russell Thomas, the Director of the Tennessee Alcoholic Beverages Commission, refused to defend the residency requirement in accordance with the Attorney General’s opinion. The district court issued an injunction against the State, preventing enforcement of the residency requirement. The State declined to appeal, but the the Tennessee ABC chose to do so themselves. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit found the residency requirement under the Commerce Clause. The Tennessee ABC again appealed, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari.

7 - 2 decision for the Association

Association

Thomas

Roberts

Breyer

Gorsuch

Kavanaugh

Alito

Ginsburg

Thomas

Sotomayor

Kagan

Cite this page