National Pork Producers Council v. Ross

Home | All Cases | Congressional Authority | National Pork Producers Council v. Ross

Case Overview

CITATION

ARGUED ON

DECIDED ON

DECIDED BY

598 U.S. 356

Oct. 11, 2022

May 11, 2023

Legal Issues

Did Proposition 12 place an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce?

Holding

No, Proposition 12 isn’t unconstitutional because it doesn’t purposefully discriminate against other states, even though it does have extraterritorial effects.

Pigs confined on a farm | Credit: The Animal Legal Defense Fund

Background

In 2018, California voters approved Proposition 12, which revised the State’s existing standards for the in-state sale of eggs and created new standards for the in-state sale of pork and veal products. Regarding the new pork standards, Proposition 12 prohibited the sale of pork from breeding pigs (or their immediate offspring) that are “confined in a cruel manner.” A confinement is considered “cruel” if it prevents the pig from “lying down, standing up, fully extending [its] limbs, or turning around freely.”

Shortly after the law was enacted, the National Pork Producers Council and the American Farm Bureau Federation challenged Proposition 12 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. The District Court upheld Proposition 12 as constitutional, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed. The Supreme Court then granted certiorari.

5 - 4 decision for Ross

NPCC

Ross

Kavanaugh

Roberts

Gorsuch

Jackson

Alito

Barrett

Thomas

Sotomayor

Kagan

Cite this page