National Pork Producers Council v. Ross
Home | All Cases | Congressional Authority | National Pork Producers Council v. Ross
Case Overview
CITATION
ARGUED ON
DECIDED ON
DECIDED BY
598 U.S. 356
Oct. 11, 2022
May 11, 2023
Legal Issues
Did Proposition 12 place an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce?
Holding
No, Proposition 12 isn’t unconstitutional because it doesn’t purposefully discriminate against other states, even though it does have extraterritorial effects.
Pigs confined on a farm | Credit: The Animal Legal Defense Fund
Background
In 2018, California voters approved Proposition 12, which revised the State’s existing standards for the in-state sale of eggs and created new standards for the in-state sale of pork and veal products. Regarding the new pork standards, Proposition 12 prohibited the sale of pork from breeding pigs (or their immediate offspring) that are “confined in a cruel manner.” A confinement is considered “cruel” if it prevents the pig from “lying down, standing up, fully extending [its] limbs, or turning around freely.”
Shortly after the law was enacted, the National Pork Producers Council and the American Farm Bureau Federation challenged Proposition 12 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. The District Court upheld Proposition 12 as constitutional, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed. The Supreme Court then granted certiorari.
5 - 4 decision for Ross
NPCC
Ross
Kavanaugh
Roberts
Gorsuch
Jackson
Alito
Barrett
Thomas
Sotomayor
Kagan